MR
WTA · Rank #664
WTA · Rank #664
Merna Refaat: Predictions and form
0%Hit rate
1
Matches tracked
Form guide
WLW
Just played, coming up
Select a match to open its page
ITF Women - W50 Austin: A. Gasanova against M. Refaat, 17:30, Finished. Winner odds: A. Gasanova 1.21, M. Refaat 4.35. Predicted winner: A. Gasanova, priced at 1.21, trust score 5.6 of 10. Graded a hit. Predicted scoreline: 6-4, 4-6, 6-4. Our best tip: A. Gasanova, priced at 1.21, trust score 5.6 of 10. Graded a hit.
A. Gasanova
M. Refaat
ITF Women - W50 Austin: M. Refaat against K. Sebov, 18:30, Finished. Winner odds: M. Refaat 2.36, K. Sebov 1.52. Predicted winner: K. Sebov, priced at 1.52, trust score 4.4 of 10. Graded a miss. Predicted scoreline: 2-6, 4-6. Our best tip: K. Sebov, priced at 1.52, trust score 4.4 of 10. Graded a miss.
M. Refaat
K. Sebov
17:30
Finished
1730
A. Gasanova
M. Refaat
2
0
▴1.21
▾4.35
1
1.21
644664
1
1.21
5.6
18:30
Finished
1830
M. Refaat
K. Sebov
2
1
2.36
1.52
2
1.52
2646
2
1.52
4.4
Results by surface
Hard
2-1
Overall
2-1
BananaCore's calls for this player
0 of 1 right
Only matches we forecast are counted
More on Merna Refaat
Merna Refaat. The record here is almost entirely on hard: 2-1. Point for point, 118.8% go this player's way.
In form: 2 of the last 3 finished matches won. No match in our data has lasted longer than the 32-game duel with K. Sebov. Open any of these matches for BananaCore's pick, a predicted scoreline and the serve and return figures behind them. Latest tournament on record: ITF Women W15 Nashville TN.
Serving and returning
1st serves in
—
Won on 1st serve
—
Won on 2nd serve
—
Aces per match
0.8
Double faults per match
6.5
Break points saved
—
Return games won
—
Points won on return
50.7%
Service points won
—
All points won
118.8%
Career
Past 12 months
0
Titles
0
Finals
0
Semi-final runs
4
Tournaments played
Results by tournament
ITF W35 Norman, OK Women
ITF
Quarter-Finals
ITF W50 Austin Women
ITF
Quarter-Finals
ITF W100 Macon Women
ITF
Round of 32
ITF W50 Berkeley, CA Women
ITF
Qualifying
Sorted by best result, not by date